Review paper about neuroscience mice behavior

A scientific review paper for 3 primary research papers. The 3 papers are the following
2-3 additional papers need to be referenced but the 3 above are the main ones that the review is about.
The attached file can be used for reference to how the format should approximately be.

Format for a review paper:
Title– reflecting topic of review
Your Name

Abstract: An abstract should be of approximately 200-300 words. Provide a brief summary of the review question being addressed or rationale for the review, the major studies reviewed, and conclusions drawn. Please do not cite references in the Abstract. It summarizes all sections.
1-3 sentences for intro including the objectives for the review.
2-4 sentences of key findings.
2-3 sentences summarizing discussion and conclusions.

Introduction: state background on topic, relevance and objectives including in text citations of introductory papers. Introduce the topic and your rationale for addressing this topic focusing on why this topic is important. Clearly define exactly what this article will discuss, outline the order in which you will discuss each subtopic to give the reader any background information needed to understand the coming sections.

Body (subtopics being addressed): Although the structure may vary based in the sub-topics or review questions being addresses. For example, if you are reviewing three different methodologies, you might divide the body of the article into three sections, each discussing one of the methods. In these sections, be sure to describe the research methods and evaluate how studies were conducted focusing on the study design and analysis e.g., intention to treat versus completers/retention rate, compare studies, and discuss their implications. Structure in thematic subheadings properly labeled by conclusions Each subsection author paraphrases key conclusions, critique and discussions showing how the results including key figures/data (images) from the articles reviewed

Conclusions: You should develop the conclusion by briefly restating the rationale for your review and the purpose of the article, then discussing the conclusions you have drawn. You should also discuss the implications of your review findings and where you think research in this field should go from here.

Literature Cited: Use a standardized referencing system. A widely used one in the medical literature is the AMA style.